You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on LINK: Blood from youth keeps you young - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: polymathwannabe 16 July 2014 01:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 17 July 2014 10:29:27AM 0 points [-]

a) In a way that's economically viable.

That depends very much on how much protein you need and how much people you can treat. It's possible to spend 100 million to genetically engineer yeast to be extremely optimized for producing a certain protein. A big pharma company can spend that much money when the drug is a block buster drug but researchers who just want the protein to run a few experiments can't.

Comment author: Alsadius 17 July 2014 01:44:53PM 0 points [-]

Given how much people spend on drugs that only pretend to reverse aging or treat one small symptom of it, I'm pretty sure a pill that actually does reverse it would be of major interest to billions of people.

Comment author: ChristianKl 17 July 2014 02:48:30PM 0 points [-]

In general yes, if the protein works as a good drug the matter of synthesising it is a solvable engineering problem.

However we are not talking about a pill. We are talking about a daily injection. We are also not talking about completely reversing all aging but some aspects while likely suffering side effects.

Given the priors in a case like this, it's unlikely that everyone will soon take daily injections of the protein.