You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

V_V comments on [LINK] Another "LessWrongers are crazy" article - this time on Slate - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: CronoDAS 18 July 2014 04:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 18 July 2014 07:30:14AM 15 points [-]

Out of curiosity, what is the fraction of LW posters that believes this is a genuine risk?

Vanishingly small - the post was deleted by Eliezer (was that what, a year ago? two?) because it gave some people he knew nightmares, but I don't remember anybody actually complaining about it. Most of the ensuing drama was about whether Eliezer was right in deleting it. The whole thing has been a waste of everybody's time and attention (as community drama over moderation almost always is).

Comment author: V_V 18 July 2014 09:32:05PM *  -1 points [-]

Vanishingly small - the post was deleted by Eliezer (was that what, a year ago? two?) because it gave some people he knew nightmares

Given that nobody else ever complained, AFAIK, it seem that he was the only person troubled by that post.

EDIT: not.

Comment author: David_Gerard 18 July 2014 10:46:08PM 5 points [-]

I got email from basilisk victims, as noted elsewhere in this thread (this is why I created the RW article, 'cos individual email doesn't scale).

Comment author: V_V 19 July 2014 10:43:35AM 3 points [-]

Point taken.