You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Shri comments on [QUESTION]: Looking for insights from machine learning that helped improve state-of-the-art human thinking - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: VipulNaik 25 July 2014 02:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (3)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Shri 25 July 2014 04:01:26AM *  3 points [-]

You may be interested in this white paper by a Google enginer using a NN to predict power consumption for their data centers with 99.6% accuracy.

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2014/05/better-data-centers-through-machine.html

Looking at the interals of the model he was able to determine how sensitive the power consumption was to various factors. 3 examples were given for how the new model let them optimize power consumption. I'm a total newbie to ML but this is one of the only examples I've seen where: predictive model -> optimization.

Here's another example you might like from Kaggle cause-effect pairs challenge. The winning model was able to accurately classify whether A->B, or B->A with and AUC of >.8 , which is better than some medical tests. A writeup and code were provided by the top three kagglers.

http://clopinet.com/isabelle/Projects/NIPS2013/

Comment author: VipulNaik 25 July 2014 06:49:15AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, both of these look interesting. I'm reading the Google paper right now.