You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Clarity comments on Look for the Next Tech Gold Rush? - Less Wrong Discussion

34 Post author: Wei_Dai 19 July 2014 10:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (113)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clarity 05 November 2015 10:29:01AM 0 points [-]

For those political connectors LWers, what could governments do to promote uptake of decentralised currencies that wouldn't have immediate negative externalities?

Comment author: ChristianKl 05 November 2015 12:29:30PM 0 points [-]

Why would governments want to promote uptake of decentralized currencies in the first place?

Western countries have no interest in Bitcoin directly.

There is an interest to prevent fake medical drugs from being sold. I could imagine laws that force every sold drug to have a verifiable chain of ownership from the factory that produces the drug to the pharmacy that sells it. A chain that's backed up by the blockchain.

In developing countries it can be useful to be able to verify how money travels through the system. Stellar and Ripple provide technologies that enable that. I can imagine a government deciding to pay every of it's employees via Stellar to prevent a boss from taking part of the paycheck from his underlings. Taking tax payments via the Stellar network would further make it the default system.

A government cares about a bunch of long-term predictions about how it's economy is going. It might be worth for creating subventioned prediction markets in Augur for climate changes 10 years from now or for various economic forecasts for which it's good to have reliable data. Subventioned prediction markets might work better than paying government burocrats to do forecasts in many cases.