You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

blogospheroid comments on Open thread, July 21-27, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: polymathwannabe 21 July 2014 01:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (160)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 25 July 2014 10:01:53AM 3 points [-]

The "Mayan apocalypse" isn't an ancient prophecy.

From Wikipedia:

Misinterpretation of the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar was the basis for a popular belief that a cataclysm would take place on December 21, 2012. December 21, 2012 was simply the day that the calendar went to the next b'ak'tun, at Long Count 13.0.0.0.0. The date on which the calendar will go to the next piktun (a complete series of 20 b'ak'tuns), at Long Count 1.0.0.0.0.0, will be on October 13, 4772.

Sandra Noble, executive director of the Mesoamerican research organization Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (FAMSI), notes that "for the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle". She considers the portrayal of December 2012 as a doomsday or cosmic-shift event to be "a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in."

Comment author: blogospheroid 28 July 2014 12:48:31PM 1 point [-]

If a storm like the one described in the link had actually hit, then would people really be concerned with these fine differences?

Comment author: ChristianKl 28 July 2014 01:29:35PM 0 points [-]

I don't see how a good time for partying and apocalypse are only distinguished by a fine difference.

Anyone who would put a serious thought and effort into reading and understanding ancient prophecies certainly would be concerned about the difference.