You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

pianoforte611 comments on Value ethics vs. agency ethics - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 [deleted] 26 July 2014 07:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (60)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pianoforte611 27 July 2014 12:45:09PM *  -1 points [-]

You're still biting the bullet? Then lets do it. Replace the fat man with farmed babies. Doesn't satisfy the secret condition but since only farmed babies are used, no one has to worry about getting kidnapped and having their organs harvested - so no worries about society collapsing into anarchy over fear. The utilitarian credentials of this world are impeccable - the loss of utility from killing farmed humans is way overshadowed by the advances in biomedical technology and research.

If you're still willing to bite this bullet, I'm curious what you would say about my other objection. Even if utilitarianism is accepted as a global theory of ethics (evaluating what worlds are better than others), no utilitarian is self consistent enough to apply this theory to himself/herself. Does anyone actually think that the morally ideal life is one spent barely subsisting while focusing almost all of their efforts on others? Its quite easy to say yes from then comfort of your current life, to affirm a belief in belief, but to actually believe in this ideal and try to live up to it is much harder - not even Peter Singer comes close.

Comment author: Jiro 27 July 2014 04:49:22PM *  0 points [-]

I'm not arguing for utilitarianism, I'm arguing against a specific objection to utilitarianism. I would object to the farmed babies scenario, but I wouldn't object to it on grounds that would apply to the fat man scenario.

(If you think I'm arguing for utilitarianism, see my recent comment on immigration. I pointed out that letting in unlimited immigrants to increase their utility basically is the scenario of barely subsisting and spending everything to help others, except you're demanding that the nation spend it instead of yourself.)

Comment author: pianoforte611 27 July 2014 05:21:48PM -1 points [-]

Okay, I'm not arguing that utilitarianism is self defeating or anything like that. Its perfectly self consistent, and I find its basic conclusions repellent.