You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RichardKennaway comments on Open thread, August 4 - 10, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: polymathwannabe 04 August 2014 12:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (307)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SolveIt 04 August 2014 12:56:32PM 8 points [-]

A thought I've had floating around for a few years now.

With the Internet, it's a lot easier to self-study than ever before. This changes the landscape. Money is much less of a limiting factor, and things like time, motivation, and availability of learning material are now more important. It occurs to me that the last is greatly language-dependent. If the only language you speak is spoken by five million other people, you might as well not have the Internet at all. But even if you speak a major language, the material you'll be getting is greatly inferior in quantity, and probably quality, to material available to English speakers. Just checking stats for Wikipedia, the English version is many times larger than other versions and scores much better on all indices. For newer things like MOOCS and Quora, the gap is even larger, and a counterpart often doesn't even exist (Based on my experiences with Korean, my native language).

Could this spark a significant education gap between English speakers and non-speakers? Since learning through the web has only recently become competitive with traditional methods of learning, we shouldn't expect to see the bulk of the effects for at least a decade or so.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 04 August 2014 01:45:20PM 5 points [-]

things like time, motivation, and availability of learning material are now more important.

And ability to learn.

Could this spark a significant education gap between English speakers and non-speakers?

The greater the gap, the greater the incentive for non-speakers to narrow the gap by becoming speakers.

Comment author: SolveIt 04 August 2014 04:16:31PM 1 point [-]

Yes, but only if the gap is known to exist.