You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Moloch: optimisation, "and" vs "or", information, and sacrificial ems - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 06 August 2014 03:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 August 2014 12:18:21AM 4 points [-]

Ok, now to the point. The "Moloch" idea is very interesting, and, at the FHI, we may try to do some research in this area (naming it something more respectable/boring, of course, something like "how to avoid stable value-losing civilization attractors").

Given that we don't want to stay with jargon that's not open to outsiders it would be great if we could find a good catch phrase that not as long as the one you suggest.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 07 August 2014 10:17:21AM 7 points [-]

Given that we don't want to stay with jargon that's not open to outsiders

You haven't experienced academia, have you? ;-)

But a good catch phrase alongside the dull description would be a good idea.

Comment author: Vulture 08 August 2014 01:24:25AM 2 points [-]

I think Scott's river/landscape imagery was pretty fitting. Maybe something like "value sinkholes"?