You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Ef_Re comments on Open thread, 11-17 August 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: David_Gerard 11 August 2014 10:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (268)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Ef_Re 16 August 2014 06:35:30PM 0 points [-]

That would normally be referred to as consequentialism, not utilitarianism.

Comment author: 2ZctE 18 August 2014 03:08:25AM *  0 points [-]

Huh, I'm not sure actually, I had been thinking of consequentialism as being the general class of ethical theories based on caring about the state of the world, and that it's utilitarianism when you try to maximize some definition of utility (which could be human value-fulfillment if you tried to reason about it quantitatively). If my usages are unusual I more or less inherited them from the consequentialism faq I think

Comment author: Ef_Re 22 August 2014 11:46:07PM 0 points [-]

If you mean Yvain's, while his stuff is in general excellent, I recommend learning about philosophical nomenclature from actual philosophers, not medics.