You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Sysice comments on Questions on the human path and transhumanism. - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: HopefullyCreative 12 August 2014 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sysice 13 August 2014 07:22:34AM 2 points [-]

I don't disagree with you- this would, indeed, be a sad fate for humanity, and certainly a failed utopia. But the failing here is not inherent to the idea of an AGI that takes action on its own to improve humanity- it's of one that doesn't do what we actually want it to do, a failure to actually achieve friendliness.

Speaking of what we actually want, I want something more like what's hinted at in the fun theory sequence than one that only slowly improves humanity over decades, which seems to be what you're talking about here. (Tell me if I misunderstood, of course.)

Comment author: HopefullyCreative 13 August 2014 07:35:08AM 0 points [-]

You actually hit the nail on the head in terms of understanding the AGI I was referencing.

I thought about problems such as why would a firm researching crop engineering to solve world hunger bother with paying a full and very expensive staff? Wouldn't an AGI that not only crunches the numbers but manages mobile platforms for physical experimentation be more cost effective? The AGI would be smarter and run around the clock testing, postulating and experimenting. Researchers would quickly find themselves out of a job if the ideal AGI were born for this purpose.

Of course if men took on artificial enhancements their own cognitive abilities could improve to compete. They could even potentially digitally network ideas or even manage mobile robotic platforms with their minds as well. It seems therefore that the best solution to the potential labor competition problems with AGI is to simply use the AGI to help or outright research methods of making men mentally and physically better.