You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Stuart_Armstrong comments on The metaphor/myth of general intelligence - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 18 August 2014 04:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 20 August 2014 10:42:26AM 1 point [-]

Humanity might have a chance against a non-generally-intelligent paperclip maximizer, but probably less of a chance against a hoard of different maximizers.

That is very unclear, and people's politics seems a good predictor of their opinions in "competing intelligences" scenarios, meaning that nobody really has a clue.

Comment author: Pentashagon 21 August 2014 02:59:33AM 1 point [-]

My intuition is that a single narrowly focused specialized intelligence might have enough flaws to be tricked or outmaneuvered by humanity, for example if an agent wanted to maximize production of paperclips but was average or poor at optimizing mining, exploration, and research it could be cornered and destroyed before it discovered nanotechnology or space travel and asteroids and other planets and spread out of control. Multiple competing intelligences would explore more avenues of optimization, making coordination against them much more difficult and likely interfering with many separate aspects of any coordinated human plan.