You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on The metaphor/myth of general intelligence - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 18 August 2014 04:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 20 August 2014 06:08:26PM *  4 points [-]

Wide range of body types for Olympic athletes...I recommend The Sports Gene for an overview of the physical qualities needed for excellent performance.

They have a wide range of body types... for elite world-class one-out-of-millions competition, where even the tiniest differences like favorable genetic mutations make a difference. This in no way disproves the idea of an SQ, any more than grades in a math graduate course outpredicting an IQ test for who will win a Fields Medal would disprove the idea of an IQ test.

A sports quotient isn't a totally crazy idea, but I think it makes more sense as "can play a number of sports reasonably well" measurement rather than measuring the likelihood of achieving excellence at any sport.

Generally speaking, it's usually possible to devise a test for a specific field which outperforms an IQ test, adds predictive value above and beyond IQ. What's interesting about IQ is how general it is, how early in life it starts being useful, and how most good field-specific tests will subsume or partially measure IQ as well.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 21 August 2014 12:15:21AM 1 point [-]

The other surprising thing about IQ is how early it was invented.