You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

bramflakes comments on Quantified Risks of Gay Male Sex - Less Wrong Discussion

33 Post author: pianoforte611 18 August 2014 11:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bramflakes 20 August 2014 01:04:29PM 22 points [-]

I once debated with myself whether I should donate blood given that I'd had sex with men before, but whom I was sure were HIV-negative. I did a quick Fermi estimate looking at the amount of contaminated blood samples the blood bank could expect nationally, first with only heterosexual donors, and then with heterosexual + homosexual donors, given that each blood sample underwent the most accurate HIV tests. The results were pretty staggering (order of magnitude difference).

That convinced me that the proscription was there for a very good reason and that I shouldn't violate it.