You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

owencb comments on Why we should err in both directions - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: owencb 21 August 2014 11:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (7)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: owencb 22 August 2014 10:27:42AM 1 point [-]

I think the same argument works if there could be multiple peaks (even if my picture doesn't cover that case) -- you just need the local properties around the optimum to run things. But in that case you can't assume a local optimum is a global optimum, so it's harder to apply.

As you say in many cases we don't need to worry about these complications, so I haven't spent too much time on that.