You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Azathoth123 comments on Open thread, 25-31 August 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: jaime2000 25 August 2014 11:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (227)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 28 August 2014 04:11:31AM 0 points [-]

It isn't clear to me that we would have anything resembling the approaches to a scientific concept of consciousness that we have today, were it not for passing through something like psychoanalysis on the way. Freud's contributions would have been replaceable, of course, had he not been there — just as Galileo's would be. But condemning Freud seems like condemning Newton, who likewise had plenty of wrong ideas.

The cult of Freud is unfortunate, but not particularly relevant to his contribution.

Comment author: Azathoth123 28 August 2014 05:32:16AM 9 points [-]

But condemning Freud seems like condemning Newton, who likewise had plenty of wrong ideas.

The difference is that Newton also had plenty of right ideas.

Comment author: satt 30 August 2014 05:01:40PM *  1 point [-]

The difference is that Newton also had plenty of right ideas.

What did you think of the four Freudian ideas Viliam_Bur suggested to you?

Edit, September 2: well, now I guess I know.