You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RichardKennaway comments on Truth and the Liar Paradox - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: casebash 02 September 2014 02:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 02 September 2014 06:06:24AM 3 points [-]

The paradox is a refutation of the assertion that such a hygienist exists (assuming the implied fact that he only cleans the teeth of those who don't clean their own, or there's no paradox). Since the hygienist does not exist, there is no-one who cleans the hygienist's teeth.

If P is the asserted property of the hygienist, R the relation x R y = x cleans y's teeth, and Q x the property "x cleans a hygienist's teeth", the matter can be formalised as follows.

P is defined by: P x =def (∀y. x R y ⇔ ¬(y R y))

P x implies (by substituting x for y in the quantifier) x R x ⇔ ¬(x R x), which is equivalent to false. Therefore no x satisfies P x.

Q is defined by: Q x =def ∃y. P(y) ∧ x R y

Since P(y) is always false, no x satisfies Q x.