You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

skeptical_lurker comments on "NRx" vs. "Prog" Assumptions: Locating the Sources of Disagreement Between Neoreactionaries and Progressives (Part 1) - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Matthew_Opitz 04 September 2014 04:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (340)
Tags: iq wireheading neoreaction

Comments (340)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 06 September 2014 12:16:33PM 2 points [-]

That was what I meant - did you think I meant a propaganda campaign against homosexuality?

Comment author: V_V 06 September 2014 12:35:41PM -2 points [-]

homosexuality != infertility

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 06 September 2014 01:00:02PM 1 point [-]

I feel the need to point out that I started by saying

Suppose, for sake of argument, that gays are a big threat because of underpopulation

I don't actually think this is very plausible. Its a hypothetical.

Comment author: V_V 06 September 2014 01:24:03PM 0 points [-]

Ok, missed that hypothesis.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit