= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lfghjkl comments on Goal retention discussion with Eliezer - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (26)
Very relevant article from the sequences: Detached Lever Fallacy.
Not saying you're committing this fallacy, but it does explain some of the bigger problems with "raising an AI like a child" that you might not have thought of.
I completely made this mistake right up until the point I read that article.
Hardly dispositive. A utility function that says "learn and care what your parents care about" looks relatively simple on paper. And we know the minumum intelligence required is that of a human toddler,
Citation needed. That sounds extremely complex to specify.
relatively
I don't think "learn and care about what your parents care about" is noticeably simpler than abstractly trying to determine what an arbitrary person cares about or CEV.