You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DavidAgain comments on Deception detection machines - Less Wrong Discussion

2 [deleted] 05 September 2014 08:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DavidAgain 06 September 2014 08:03:53AM 1 point [-]

To me it sounds like the full information provided to avoid being incomplete would be so immense and complex that you'd need another AI just to interpret that! But I may be wrong.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 September 2014 03:50:27PM 1 point [-]

The data is immense, but the deeception detector's job involves only applying simple rules. It's effectively a compressor that compresses the AI logs down to "utility functions + search parameters" which is small enough to be inspected directly.