You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on Ways to improve LessWrong - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: adamzerner 14 September 2014 02:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (102)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 14 September 2014 03:01:02PM *  3 points [-]

Many LW users are not from USA, but USA is probably the only country with enough LW users for a meaningful political action. So I guess we can assume that we are going to influence American politics (because we don't have enough people in any other country), but in ways that most LW users would agree with, regardless of their country (because otherwise we couldn't achieve cooperation on this website). This is not wrong, per se, just counter-intuitive, so I am saying it explicitly. (Majority of LW users would almost certainly include majority of American LW users.)

It could be interesting to find out whether there are political suggestions that, say, 95% of LW users would agree with. If people think directly about the usual party lines, that's the wrong place for consensus. But there could be something which is not so important for either American party, and where a rational consensus could be found. (Robin Hanson calls it "pulling policy ropes sideways".) If we can identify those issues, then perhaps we could try to fight for one of them, just as an experiment to see what we can achieve.