You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Daniel_Burfoot comments on What are your contrarian views? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Metus 15 September 2014 09:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (806)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 15 September 2014 02:10:46PM 3 points [-]

Our society is ruled by a Narrative which has no basis in reality and is essentially religious in character. Every component of the Narrative is at best unjustified by actual evidence, and at worst absurd on the face of it. Moreover, most leading public intellectuals never seriously question the Narrative because to do so is to be expelled from their positions of prestige. The only people who can really poke holes in the Narrative are people like Peter Thiel and Nassim Taleb, whose positions of wealth and prestige are independently guaranteed.

The lesson is that in the modern world, if you want to be a philosopher, you should first become a billionaire. Then and only then will you have the independence necessary to pursue truth.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 15 September 2014 02:20:05PM 3 points [-]

What exactly does that Narrative say?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 15 September 2014 06:36:11PM 9 points [-]

Why would he answer you without first being a billionaire?

Comment author: [deleted] 21 September 2014 08:45:06AM *  1 point [-]

Read “How Dawkins Got Pwned” by Mencius Moldbug. (Warning: it's long.)

Comment author: CellBioGuy 19 September 2014 03:18:25PM *  1 point [-]

This seems obvious to me. Except that in order to become a billionaire you need to act exactly as if you believe in the narrative and probably come to believe it.

EDIT: Though I fail to see how Thiel pokes 'the narrative' - it seems to me he doubles down even harder on large chunks of it.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 September 2014 08:51:06AM 1 point [-]

EDIT: Though I fail to see how Thiel pokes 'the narrative' - it seems to me he doubles down even harder on large chunks of it.

Probably you and Daniel Burfoot are thinking of different Narratives. I guess the one he's thinking about is what Moldbug calls “Universalism”, “the blue pill”, “M.42”, and other such deliberately silly names.

Comment author: FiftyTwo 21 September 2014 12:51:15AM 0 points [-]

What possible evidence can you have for the existence of a great truth which is by definition not available to you?

Comment author: Daniel_Burfoot 21 September 2014 04:14:27PM 1 point [-]

It's available to me, I just can't talk about it with other people.