You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

lmm comments on What are your contrarian views? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Metus 15 September 2014 09:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (806)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: lmm 15 September 2014 09:21:36PM 14 points [-]

[Please read the OP before voting. Special voting rules apply.]

The notion of freedom is incoherent. People would be better off abandoning the pursuit of it.

Comment author: shminux 15 September 2014 10:11:49PM 3 points [-]

What do you think of Free Will Is as Real as Baseball?

Comment author: lmm 16 September 2014 09:58:31PM 0 points [-]

I think it's arguing a level below where I'm coming from (though possibly there's some self-similarity here).

None of this quite settles the question of whether “free will” is actually a crucial ingredient in the best theory of human beings we can imagine developing.

I think it isn't. Which makes the rest of the page true but irrelevant.

Comment author: [deleted] 15 September 2014 09:49:37PM 3 points [-]

Freedom meaning what?

Free choice? I don't believe in that.

The right to make any choice which doesn't impair the choices of others? I strongly agree with that.

Comment author: lmm 16 September 2014 10:02:13PM 0 points [-]

I think both are unhelpful.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 15 September 2014 09:34:41PM 1 point [-]

Where does the incoherence lie?

Comment author: lmm 15 September 2014 09:42:07PM 1 point [-]

The way freedom is usually formulated, in the notion of free will or free choices.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 17 September 2014 04:05:28PM 2 points [-]

This is frustrating: I think I can argue against the standard argument of he incoherence of FW...but you haven't given it...or any other,

Comment author: polymathwannabe 15 September 2014 09:48:13PM 2 points [-]

To make sure I'm getting this right: is this the school of anti-freedom where the notion of moral responsibility is also deemed incoherent?

Comment author: lmm 16 September 2014 10:03:05PM -1 points [-]

I would also consider the notion of moral responsibility incoherent. It's not obvious to me that these positions have a common basis.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 16 September 2014 10:11:54PM 1 point [-]

The latter derives from the former:

If my actions are spontaneous and uncaused, I'm not responsible for them.

If my actions are mechanically determined by atoms in my brain, I'm not responsible for them.