You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

blacktrance comments on What are your contrarian views? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Metus 15 September 2014 09:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (806)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: blacktrance 16 September 2014 10:13:18PM *  7 points [-]

[Please read the OP before voting. Special voting rules apply.]

There is nothing morally wrong about eating meat, and vegetarianism/veganism aren't morally superior to meat-eating.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 September 2014 11:45:57PM 6 points [-]

That looks like a mainstream position, not contrarian.

Comment author: blacktrance 17 September 2014 12:07:17AM *  3 points [-]

It's contrarian among LWers, which is what the OP asked for.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 September 2014 04:03:36AM 7 points [-]

Is that so? I know there are some vocal vegetarians on LW, I am not sure that makes them the local mainstream.

Comment author: Prismattic 17 September 2014 05:20:15AM 7 points [-]

I think there are more LW members who are meat-eating and feel hypocritical/gulity about it than there are actual vegetarians.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 September 2014 02:44:47PM 7 points [-]

Looking at the 2013 poll:

VEGETARIAN:
No: 1201, 73.4%
Yes: 213, 13.0%
Did not answer: 223, 13.6%

I can't speak to the feeling of guilt, but vegetarians are a small minority here.

Comment author: William_Quixote 07 October 2014 03:49:08PM 0 points [-]

At the time of the poll people had requested more granularity in the answers. I think a lot of folks leaned towards veggie ideas in the sense of reduced or substanceualy below average meat consumption without actualy being vegitayians.

As to how many a lot was, who knows. I think it's likely that vegetarianism is probably more acceptable here than in the population at large and so disagreeing with it would be more contrarian

Comment author: Elo 16 September 2014 11:07:46PM 1 point [-]

agree (mostly), (not vegetarian) would you prefer to eat a bacterial-produced meat product? Assuming it could be made to taste the same...

Comment author: blacktrance 16 September 2014 11:38:44PM 4 points [-]

If its price was less than or equal to the price of normal meat, I'd buy it, otherwise, I'd stick with normal meat.

Comment author: Elo 17 September 2014 06:22:30AM 1 point [-]

I suspect it will end up being cheaper because it would be faster to produce than an entire life-cycle of an animal...

Comment author: falenas108 21 September 2014 07:43:17PM 0 points [-]

For most of the vegetarians I know, the issue isn't inherently eating meat. It's the way the animals are treated before they are killed.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 September 2014 09:05:28PM 1 point [-]

For most of the vegetarians I know, the issue isn't inherently eating meat. It's the way the animals are treated before they are killed.

Maybe you know a weird subset of vegetarians, but I don't think most would be fine with eating a dead animal that has been very well treated throughout its life.