You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

lmm comments on Open thread, September 15-21, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: gjm 15 September 2014 12:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (339)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lmm 16 September 2014 08:59:09PM *  1 point [-]

You're right, I was taking the linked thing at face value.

The signature given is almost exactly Comonad. If I'm reading this right, Loeb's theorem gives you something vaguely interesting: it's a function from C[A] => A to A. So it tells you that any function that "flattens" a comonad must have some kind of "zero" value - e.g. any Stream[A] => A must give rise to a distinguished value of type A - which you can extract without ever having an instance of Stream[A].

I've replied with Scala code upthread.