You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open thread, September 22-28, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Gunnar_Zarncke 22 September 2014 05:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (213)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 24 September 2014 01:45:00PM 2 points [-]

he's back and behaving in the same way that got him thrown out the first time it's in any way worrying that he hasn't been re-expelled yet.

Back in days where I was moderating a forum, rebanning a reregistered person might have taken a week and not months. Given the amount of time I spent on LW I wouldn't have expected that it takes me that long but then I'm not thinking anymore with the moderator hat.

Block LW access from his IP address

That doesn't accomplish anything given the availability of proxies. Expect maybe being an insult in his perceived lack of IT knowledge.

reverse every vote he ever cast, that sort of thing

That needs someone to write the necessary code.

Comment author: gjm 24 September 2014 04:06:11PM 4 points [-]

I'm all for insulting people who abuse the system :-). And for putting trivial inconveniences in their way, if nontrivial ones are too difficult.

And presumably, indeed, reversing all someone's votes isn't currently supported by whatever LW admin tools there are, and implementing that feature would be a non-negligible cost to weigh against the ability to disincentivize abuse in that way.

(For the avoidance of ambiguity: I meant "undo", not "reverse the sign of". It would be quite amusing to reverse the sign of all someone's votes as a punishment for abuse, but I can think of more than one reason why it probably wouldn't be a good idea.)

Comment author: ChristianKl 24 September 2014 08:50:40PM 1 point [-]

People switching IP addresses makes it harder to track that they are reregistering, so it's usually no smart move to force this behavior.