= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
okay comments on Beyond type 1 vs. type 2 processing: the tri-dimensional way (link) - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (8)
Are there examples in the different octants suggested by this? In particular, is there an example of something automatic, but slow and effortful?
This is what I was curious about as well. The other "weird" octant, manual, fast, easy, seems to be populated by the fact that we can feed things from system 2 to system 1 to simulate. Automatic, but slow and effortful seems like it is "system 1 feeding system 2 things." WHich again brings to mind math, but maybe processing of emotional experiences as well.
fast-effortful seems implausible?
Try playing a video game.
Trying to balance on one foot?
Applying social intelligence in high-pressure situations? (As in "How do I keep Dad from killing me when I tell him I just destroyed the car?")
Acting? (As in stage and film acting.) You have to "fake" various subtle signals people aren't usually consciously aware of.