You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

SolveIt comments on What's the right way to think about how much to give to charity? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: irrational 24 September 2014 09:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (72)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SolveIt 26 September 2014 02:59:51PM 0 points [-]

What does it mean for humans to have logarithmic utility for money? Do we have a measurable quantitative concept of utility that's natural enough that it would be silly to pull stuff like "utility2= log utility1, now humans have linear utility2 for money"!

Comment author: owencb 28 September 2014 05:29:03PM 4 points [-]

The main ways to get a handle on this are to use subjective well-being scores (which is what those graphs do, and is somewhat questionable as to whether it's a natural unit), or to ask people about trade-offs or gambles they'd make (to elicit preferences as in a vN-M utility function). Both approaches lead to data saying it's approximately logarithmic, and there are also some theoretical reasons to think this is roughly right.