You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

VAuroch comments on Open thread, Sept. 29 - Oct.5, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: polymathwannabe 29 September 2014 01:28PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (339)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: VAuroch 29 September 2014 11:20:48PM 0 points [-]

Much more than 4 years and you're getting dangerously close to the points when the production drops off and the supply of new coins dries up, which will trigger a partial or total burst of the Bitcoin bubble. That might not render the Bitcoin valueless (though I think it will), but will certainly make them bad investments.

I consider this a near-certainty within 8 years, and a significant risk starting around 5 years from now. It's a minor risk even now, but I don't expect it to blow up until at least the next reward-halving.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 September 2014 12:00:52AM 3 points [-]

That doesn't make any economic sense. Right now bitcoin is being inflated, which means people are spending hundreds of millions of dollars a year to keep the price stable (or not, as it is dropping). Get rid of the subsidy and demand would drive the price up, not down.

Comment author: Ander 29 September 2014 11:42:35PM 3 points [-]

I disagree. The reward halvings cannot come soon enough for bitcoin. Right now bitcoin (the community of bitcoin holders) is spending hundreds of millions of dollars a year in order to secure the network (in the form of new coins being created and sold onto the market). This has been pressuring the bitcoin price all year. Hundreds of millions in would-be bitcoin investment, sucked into mining hardware and electricity costs.

Here is a excellent video discussing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-TLA3j-ic4