You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JenniferRM comments on Contrarian LW views and their economic implications - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: Larks 08 October 2014 11:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (126)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JenniferRM 16 October 2014 07:52:28AM 3 points [-]

106 comments so far and the word "artificial" (as in "artificial general intelligence", AI, or AGI) hasn't come up!?

As near as I can tell, if someone gets AGI to really work properly (and get even a not-very-explodey sort of intelligence explosion, just exponential curves with double times of months or years), it is likely, in the span of years to decades, to become worth more than the entire present value of the economy of the planet. How can this not be an investment opportunity?

Comment author: Larks 17 October 2014 12:10:01AM 2 points [-]

Also I appreciate the way you incremented the count, and expressed implicit minor surprise that your previous comment did not mention AGI!

Comment author: Larks 17 October 2014 12:09:14AM 1 point [-]

Perhaps it is in part due to my suggestion of a 1-3 year time horizon. But it is plausible that it could be discovered in 1-3 years.

Do you have suggestions on how one would invest on this thesis? (Invest in land and commodities? Or Google???)

Comment author: JenniferRM 17 October 2014 04:32:46AM 2 points [-]

For what it is worth, I started working at Google about five months ago and am legally classified (as are all of Google's full time software engineers) as an "insider". Thus: no comment :-P