= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwillen comments on 2014 Less Wrong Census/Survey - Call For Critiques/Questions - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (269)
I strongly agree with the basilisk suggestion; have you provided Yvain with a specific question and set of answers to use, per his request, or can you do so?
Or would you not be satisfied with including it as a Super Extra Bonus Question, wanting it to be in the main body of the survey?
I believe I did so, but Yvain is a smart enough cookie that I don't really need to draw up a list of exact phrasings. The question is not how exactly the question will be written, the question is whether such a question will be allowed at all.
If it is to serve its intended purpose, it would be much better to get it in the main body of the survey to defang the sample size objection.
He said “Please be specific - not "Ask something about taxes" but give the exact question you want me to ask as well as all answer choices.”
The basilisk question is an exception.
No it isn't