zedzed comments on Open thread, Oct. 13 - Oct. 19, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (355)
The best way to improve writing will vary largely by person. Here's what worked/is working for me that I think generalizes better than average:
Also, getting to this level doesn't need to take much. You can get absurd mileage out of "Omit needless words".
Find a person other than yourself who's writing something and would like a beta. Things that you should probably look for: intelligence, similarity in writing goals, divergence in writing style.
Act as a beta reader. Make suggestions liberally. That is, if you see a change you might make and are unsure if it will improve the writing, suggest it; your primary will either accept or reject it. The important part is you discussion points of disagreement.
You can, of course, go at this from the opposite side (as a primary who finds a beta), but my system 1 says the other way is easier. They guy I currently beta for had to put in an absolutely absurd amount of work to get to the point of taking on betas, whereas I just had to leave a review saying "this is pretty good, but you could improve x, y, and z, and you could really use a beta, and I'd be up for it because this story will be awesome if you can clean this stuff up."
Note that although Strunk and White might have some reasonable advice on some topics, many of their recommendations are linguistically ignorant, just plain nonsensical, or violated all the time by excellent writers (including the authors themselves, sometimes on the same page they offer the advice). Here is a well-informed, highly negative review.
I very much agree with your advice about acting as a beta reader. It's really helpful for both parties and gets you lots of brownie points too!