You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TRIZ-Ingenieur comments on Superintelligence 5: Forms of Superintelligence - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: KatjaGrace 14 October 2014 01:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (112)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TRIZ-Ingenieur 19 October 2014 11:33:55PM 1 point [-]

Neither Bostrum nor our discussion properly distinguishes between fluid and crystallized intelligence.

Fluid intelligence is the capacity to think logically independent of aquired knowledge.
Crystallized intelligence is the ability to use skills, knowledge and experience.

Howard Gardners concept of multiple intelligences is focussing on aquiring crystallized intelligence:

As the name [multiple intelligences] indicates, I believe that human cognitive competence is better described in terms of a set of abilities, talents or mental skills, which I call intelligences. [...] Such a theory has important educational implications.

(Gardner 2006 Multiple Intelligences - New Horizons p6)

The word wisdom implicates experience and higher age. Wisdom does not need to be universal knowledge. Years of experiences in some restricted domains together with high inter- and intrapersonal intelligence build wisdom.

For our discussion on engineering seed AIs it is important to know that this AI needs wisdom in engineering. This is: high fluid intelligence, high creativity (a concept different from intelligence), and a lot of practical experience and theoretical knowledge about hard- and software engineering.