You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on What math is essential to the art of rationality? - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: Capla 15 October 2014 02:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 15 October 2014 08:06:14AM 4 points [-]

Jaynes' interpretation of probability theory as an extension of logic that calculates probability of propositions conditioned on other propositions is much more straightforward that the usual set theory formulation, and the notation he uses is enormously helpful.

Alfred Korzybski, of The Map is the Territory fame, had some chapters on the concepts of differential calculus in Science in Sanity which way back when I found provided key insights (as all the General Semantics literature does, and should get more attention here.)

Judea Pearl is the main game in town for a clear notation for the mathematical analysis of causality.

David Wolpert's theoretical framework for analyzing generalization algorithms (in which he produced Stacked Generalization) is a little more obscure, but very useful for learning theory.