You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Capla comments on What math is essential to the art of rationality? - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: Capla 15 October 2014 02:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (62)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Capla 16 October 2014 11:11:39PM *  1 point [-]

With regards to insight porn, I was actually a bit surprised to see EY say "change your outlook on life", which seems very strong. (He did say, "more than" the alternatives, so perhaps it's a bit uncharitable to critique that.)

Acknowledging that its not a substitute for real understanding, I like insight. There's no reason why I can't have them both.

Also, I'm not sure that it is always true that cheep, quick insights aren't the way intellectual growth happens. There have been many little realizations (and even just exposures to new ideas or topics), that, taken together, made for a more intellectually competent me. Sure, it's harder to "act on that knowledge in our society" (that takes self-discipline), but I consider that separate from "intellectual growth"

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 21 October 2014 01:05:27PM *  1 point [-]

I guess I don't view "intellectual growth" separately from "personal growth" (perhaps I should?) And I view personal growth as a kind of chemical reaction, where the input ingredient in smallest amounts is the limit to how far the reaction goes. In (modern, Western, internet-enabled) society, intellectual insight/knowledge is usually not the limiting ingredient. The limiting ingredient is generally the motivation to get work done. Without it, the standard failure mode for "too much insight" is online wankery, basically.