You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MaximumLiberty comments on How to write an academic paper, according to me - Less Wrong Discussion

31 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 15 October 2014 12:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: MaximumLiberty 15 October 2014 07:06:31PM *  7 points [-]

Lawyers write memos to other lawyers and the clients to tell them the answer to questions. The most common format is:

  • Question presented -- one sentence, maybe two

  • Short answer -- Ideally yes or no, but usually a couple sentences.

  • Facts -- A description of all of the background behind the question

  • Analysis or discussion -- The reasoning to get from the question, contextualized by the facts, to the answer

  • Conclusion -- A plea for more billable hours. Ahem. I mean a statement of your level of certainty with respect to your answer, and avenues of research that would lend more certainty.

I've heard of this format as being called IRAC -- issue, rule, analysis, conclusion (where the facts get thrown into the analysis).

Within the analysis, there are many ways of organizing the material, many of which I think are partially redundant of the format of the memo. Here's an example: http://www.law.cuny.edu/legal-writing/students/memorandum/memorandum-1.html.

Max L.