You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Brillyant comments on What false beliefs have you held and why were you wrong? - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: Punoxysm 16 October 2014 05:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (364)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Brillyant 17 October 2014 05:52:30PM 1 point [-]

Interesting.

One of my (many) irrational iterations of thinking about gun control had me convinced Republicans held such a staunch line on defending gun rights (in part) in order to keep the argument not about economic inequality as a causal driver for all sorts of violence, including guns.

As long as the argument was about he 2nd amendment, assault rifle bans and school shootings, no one would pay attention to the numbers showing strong correlation between gun violence (and violent crime) and disparity in income, and thus no deeper discussion about fiscal/social policy would need to occur.

I don't know about this any more. I want it to be true, because of my Blue team affiliations, but it seems a bit too conspiracy-ish for my liking. (I'm also part of the Anti-Conspiracy Team...which wears a mustard yellow uniform.)

Comment author: Jiro 17 October 2014 08:20:21PM *  3 points [-]

I don't think this is true. Gun violence is not just correlated with poverty, it's also correlated with race. And while it may be disadvantageous to Republicans to emphasize how poverty is bad, it may be advantageous to Republicans to emphasize how blacks and Hispanics are bad.

Comment author: DanielLC 18 October 2014 01:06:33AM 4 points [-]

Race is correlated with poverty, so that's expected. Is there a strong correlation beyond that?

Comment author: Desrtopa 20 October 2014 02:50:31PM 0 points [-]

There seems to be, although the studies that I've found with a quick search discuss this in terms of poverty having strong predictive value even after controlling for race (which is probably a less politically charged claim.) However, there are a lot of confounders that are not easy to adjust out of such an analysis.

Comment author: Azathoth123 20 October 2014 11:59:04PM 2 points [-]

Conversely, race also has strong predictive value after controlling for poverty.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 17 October 2014 09:56:43PM 3 points [-]

I've heard a theory that violence in the US is correlated being Southern, not with race. Anyone know whether there's anything to this?

Comment author: RomeoStevens 24 October 2014 02:02:18AM 2 points [-]

violence is correlated with temperature.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 21 November 2014 04:20:33PM *  2 points [-]

Relevant article. Less technical summary by the authors of that paper here. There is some controversy about what the underlying causal mechanism is. See this article.

Comment author: AspiringRationalist 20 October 2014 02:41:28AM *  1 point [-]

While it may be disadvantageous to Republicans to emphasize how poverty is bad, it may be advantageous to Republicans to emphasize how blacks and Hispanics are bad.

Given that a lot of people suspect Republicans of being racist, it would be extremely disadvantageous for them to openly say bad things about blacks and Hispanics.

It may, however, be advantageous for them to do so subtly.

Comment author: Brillyant 18 October 2014 03:26:12AM -1 points [-]

Isn't poverty correlated with race in the U.S.?