You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DavidLS comments on Fixing Moral Hazards In Business Science - Less Wrong Discussion

33 Post author: DavidLS 18 October 2014 09:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (96)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DavidLS 20 October 2014 04:42:29AM 0 points [-]

Thanks, that's a great point.

I'm worried that a statistical calculator will throw off founders who would otherwise test their products with us (specifically YC founders, an abnormally influential group), so as much as possible I'd like to keep sample sizes in the "Advanced Menu" section. (This is not to say this is an unimportant issue -- I'm saying this is a more important issue because many people won't be customizing the default values).

I also think there are three unique features for product studies that can help simply defining good default values here:

  • Startups are going to be interested in talking about big improvements (small sample sizes needed).
  • Startups will likely view study participation as advertising, allowing for a generous margin of error on sample size.
  • Consumers are skeptical of low-sample size studies, even when they shouldn't be.

What do you suggest we do? It sounds like getting baseline mean and variance data for the questions we include with the app is basically a requirement.

What is the awesome version of handling this issue? :p