You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam_Bur comments on Stupid Questions (10/27/2014) - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: drethelin 27 October 2014 09:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (260)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 28 October 2014 08:45:35AM 2 points [-]

all we can do is a finite amount of good or evil (which has no impact on an infinite value)

If the universe is infinite, then there are infinitely many copies of me, following the same algorithm, so my decisions create infinite amounts of good or evil (through my copies which decide the same way).

Or, to see it from another angle, if the universe is literally infinite, then it is more or less infinitely repetitive. So let's take a part of universe containing a copy of approximately everything, and treat this part as a finite universe, which is just replicated infinitely many times.

Your "measure" is the proportion of your copies to the infinite universe.

Comment author: DefectiveAlgorithm 30 October 2014 08:03:12AM 2 points [-]

If the universe is infinite, then there are infinitely many copies of me, following the same algorithm

Does this follow? The set of computable functions is infinite, but has no duplicate elements.

Comment author: Pentashagon 05 November 2014 05:09:25AM 0 points [-]

The measure of simple computable functions is probably larger than the measure of complex computable functions and I probably belong to the simpler end of computable functions.

Comment author: Navere 28 October 2014 09:04:41PM 0 points [-]

Ok, I think that helps a bit. But if there are infinite copies, how can you talk of proportions? It's not like anything you do decreases or increases the number of copies, right?