You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Azathoth123 comments on A website standard that is affordable to the poorest demographics in developing countries? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Ritalin 01 November 2014 01:43PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Azathoth123 09 November 2014 07:07:56AM 5 points [-]

Rights are bizarre, rhetorical tools, bargaining chips in the economics of pricelessness and compromise.

No, rights are (or should be) based on time-tested ethical injunctions. Granted today there is an unfortunate tendency for bodies like the UN to invent (and "de-sanctify") rights at the drop of a hat. This is undesirable behavior and should be met with mockery and derision.

Comment author: Ritalin 10 November 2014 01:05:05AM 0 points [-]

Could you expound on that "time-tested ethical injunctions" thing? I understand the concepts separately, but not how they go together, nor how they relate to "rights" as in "La Déclaration des Droits de L'Homme et du Citoyen", the "Bill of Rights", or the "UN Declaration of Human Rights".