You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

passive_fist comments on Open thread, Nov. 3 - Nov. 9, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 03 November 2014 09:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (310)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: passive_fist 04 November 2014 04:00:47AM *  4 points [-]

Thanks. That sounds a bit more like trying to get "out of the spotlight", if you get what I mean. Which I can understand. But it's possible that he's just being polite.

Comment author: Vulture 08 November 2014 06:35:43PM 1 point [-]

Good point. Given that Eliezer seems somewhat prone to saying moderately embarrassing things, it makes sense that he would want to hold discussions somewhere that's not directly associated with PR-delicate organizations and communities, and where he might be more able to better control how public things are.

Comment author: Lumifer 09 November 2014 03:15:51AM 1 point [-]

I hope you're not calling LW "PR-delicate"...

Comment author: pragmatist 09 November 2014 05:49:17AM *  0 points [-]

I think Vulture's saying LW is "directly associated" with PR-delicate organizations. MIRI and CFAR, maybe?

Comment author: Lumifer 10 November 2014 02:59:24AM 1 point [-]

The problem with this line of reasoning is that EY himself is much more directly associated with these organizations.

Comment author: Vulture 12 November 2014 04:29:31AM 0 points [-]

Yeah, but reporters are less likely to end up on his facebook page, for example.

Comment author: Vulture 10 November 2014 01:06:30AM 0 points [-]

Yeah, pretty much. LW getting a bad rap wouldn't matter for nickels if it wasn't directly tied to MIRI&c and their ideas.