First(?) Rationalist elected to state government

Eneasz

Has no one else mentioned this on LW yet?

Elizabeth Edwards has been elected as a New Hampshire State Rep, self-identifies as a Rationalist and explicitly mentions Less Wrong in her first post-election blog post.

Sorry if this is a repost

Has no one else mentioned this on LW yet?

Elizabeth Edwards has been elected as a New Hampshire State Rep, self-identifies as a Rationalist and explicitly mentions Less Wrong in her first post-election blog post.

Sorry if this is a repost

The uncharismatic official might have gotten there because of connections or some similar factor that you can't just get yourself, even if you're as charismatic as him.
The uncharismatic official might seem more charismatic to typical people than to you.
It may be hard for someone else to take his place, because the advantages of incumbency overwhelms the disadvantage he has from not being charismatic.
Public officials must lie to get into office. STEM backgrounds are unlikely to be willing and/or able to lie efficiently.
Public officials must do other dishonest things to get into office (backroom deals, for instance), which again engineers might not do.
Public officials need to compromise between various groups' ideas. STEM people work with things where there is one right answer and the need to compromise is limited, so are not very good at this, especially when one of the sides you're compromising with is outright incorrect.
Democracy is about doing what your constituents want. A STEM person who wants something different than his constituents won't get elected. This is still true if the STEM person wants it because he is more educated or more rational--democracy is about doing what the people want, not about trying to be better than them.

Public officials must lie to get into office. STEM backgrounds are unlikely to be willing and/or able to lie efficiently.

I'll have bug fixed by Friday

Also, STEM backgrounds are much more common in other countries. It's moderately quirky that so many US lawmakers are lawyers.

7sixes_and_sevens12y

I ask you to take me at my word that the elected official I'm referring to isn't simply less charismatic than me, (which is saying something), but less charismatic than a potato with a smile drawn on it. Also the "tool" characteristic is far more salient. Imagine the least appropriate human being you can think of for public office, who nonetheless owns a suit and talks in complete sentences. Envision that person as receiving a plurality of votes in an electoral district, and ask yourself why someone, anyone, wasn't in a position to stand in their place. It doesn't seem obvious to me that STEM-folk are fundamentally different types of people to non-STEM folk with regard to things like dishonesty or compromise. It also doesn't seem obvious to me that someone with a chemistry degree would have political goals more out of alignment with a hypothetical constituency than someone with a business or law degree.

109

First(?) Rationalist elected to state government

109

109

109

First(?) Rationalist elected to state government

109

109