You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Capla comments on Should we go all in on existential risk? - Considering Effective Altruism - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Capla 10 November 2014 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Capla 11 November 2014 03:47:04PM 2 points [-]

I don't actually value lives saved very much. Death's just not that big a deal. I'm more interested in producing states of wonder and joy. I want to bring as many people as can to the level of eduction and self-awareness where they can appreciate the incredibleness of the world. The saddest thing that I can think of is that there are are hundreds of thousands of people who are just as smart as I am who were never given the opportunities or encouragement that I was to come to love the world. I'm in the business of poverty elevation and disease eradication, because removing those constraints allows us to maximize fully flourished human lives. Similarly, I care about a singularity because the amount of insight to which the species has access will go through the roof.

I use "live-saved" since, as you point out, it's a sort of hot-word to which people react and associate with "doing good."