You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

peter_hurford comments on Should we go all in on existential risk? - Considering Effective Altruism - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Capla 10 November 2014 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: peter_hurford 11 November 2014 06:51:23PM 6 points [-]

diversification is a useful thing to manage your risk

But presumably you're risk-neutral to altruism, but not risk-neutral for your own personal finances.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 November 2014 06:55:07PM 1 point [-]

I don't see being risk-neutral with respect to altruism as obvious. If it turns out that you misallocated your charity dollars, you have incurred opportunity costs. In general, people are nor risk-neutral with respect to things they care about.

Comment author: Nornagest 11 November 2014 06:52:50PM *  1 point [-]

Well, you're probably less risk averse with regard to altruism. I imagine most people would still be upset to see the charity they've been donating to for years go under.