You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Salemicus comments on Link: Rob Bensinger on Less Wrong and vegetarianism - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Sysice 13 November 2014 05:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (77)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Salemicus 17 November 2014 05:13:02PM 11 points [-]

In the comments of his post, RobBB claimed that by going vegetarian, you'll cause 1500 fewer animals to be killed than otherwise. Regardless of the exact number, it strikes me that this is a highly tendentious way of putting the issue. It would surely be more accurate to say that by going vegetarian, you will caused 1500 fewer animals to be born than otherwise.

It is wrong to call a utilitarian argument for vegetarianism "air-tight" when it doesn't even consider this point.