You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

William_S comments on Superintelligence 14: Motivation selection methods - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: KatjaGrace 16 December 2014 02:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: William_S 18 December 2014 01:41:45AM *  1 point [-]

Another approach might be to dump in a whole bunch of data, and hope that the simplest model that fits the data is a good model of human values (this is like Paul Christiano's hack to attempt to specify a whole brain emulation as part of an indirect normativity if we haven't achieved whole brain emulation capability yet: http://ordinaryideas.wordpress.com/2012/04/21/indirect-normativity-write-up/). There might be other sets of data that could be used in this way, ie. run a massive survey on philosophical problems, record a bunch of people's brains while they watch stories play out in television, dump in DNA and hope it encodes stuff that points to brain regions relevant to morality etc. (I don't trust this method though).