= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
AlexMennen comments on AI caught by a module that counterfactually doesn't exist - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (22)
How does this differ from testing an AI in a simulated universe before letting it out into the real world?
It depends on what you define "simulated universe" to be. Here it uses the AIs own prediction module to gauge the future; if you want to call that a simulated universe, the position is arguably defensible.