You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

nydwracu comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Capla 17 November 2014 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (616)

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 November 2014 04:36:22AM 10 points [-]

That being said, there's ample discussion already on Slate Star Codex, and I wouldn't want to see it crowding out other topics here.

I keep hearing people say this. This is a rationalist site; why hasn't anyone gone out and generated some statistics?

Comment author: HBDfan 20 November 2014 01:07:09PM *  -1 points [-]

I'm pleased to see more neoreaction here. This post makes me confident to come back.

Lesswrong needs to use rationality to speak out against the social justice warriors more. We need more rationalists to explain Gamergate and other initiatives. SSC and Ozy come out in favor of Gamergate and Eron Gjoni for example. Politics need not be the mind killer with showing sufficient working.

Comment author: Prismattic 21 November 2014 01:16:23AM 1 point [-]

I don't understand which half of that sentence you are objecting to, or what statistic in particular you would be looking for.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 November 2014 02:47:21AM 5 points [-]

"crowding out"

Comment author: Prismattic 21 November 2014 04:52:59AM 2 points [-]

Ok, but I didn't say this had already happened. I said it is something I would not want to see happen in future. Possibly you were just using my comment as a convenient anchor for a point you were already prepping for someone else, but it doesn't really make sense to address it to me.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit