You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Douglas_Knight comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Capla 17 November 2014 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 20 November 2014 05:24:51AM 7 points [-]

You single out Tunney for being transsexual, not insane.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 20 November 2014 08:38:12AM 3 points [-]

Yes, not appropriate for being a reactionary leader in a far right group. Neoreaction is a social conservative movement. This is similar to how you wouldn't put an NRA member in charge of the local Democratic Party headquarters.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 20 November 2014 01:06:32PM 0 points [-]

NRA membership is a changeable choice based on ideologic affiliations. Gender identity is firmware. You can't compare the two.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 20 November 2014 01:42:11PM 6 points [-]
Comment author: polymathwannabe 20 November 2014 02:12:57PM *  4 points [-]

Gender reassignment surgery is not a blanket solution for every case of gender dysphoria. Variable rates of satisfaction with the surgery don't make gender identity any less of a psychoneurological fact as opposed to an ideological affiliation.

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 20 November 2014 02:20:07PM -2 points [-]

It seems like the number of people doing it is strongly correlated to the increased popularity of Tumblr.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 20 November 2014 02:30:28PM 4 points [-]

You completely lost me there. What does Tumblr have to do with anything?

Comment author: MichaelAnissimov 20 November 2014 06:55:04PM 1 point [-]

It promotes gender dysphoria by introducing it where it didn't previously exist.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 November 2014 07:54:34PM 3 points [-]

<eyeroll>

Is that the Tumblr which is chock-full of straight porn?

Comment author: Nornagest 20 November 2014 08:04:27PM *  10 points [-]

I don't necessarily endorse MichaelAnissimov's take on this particular issue, but Tumblr's a big site. You can find everything from cat picture blogs to literal Nazis on it if you look. That doesn't mean it's disproportionately cats (plausible) or Nazis (very improbable), though, nor that people are talking about cat pictures or antisemitism when they complain about Tumblr culture.

More specifically, there are basically two things you can easily use Tumblr for: image sharing and text microblogging. The former lends itself well to porn, the latter to radical politics, and the communities built up around these use cases don't overlap all that much.

Comment author: Lumifer 20 November 2014 08:14:32PM 1 point [-]

Tumblr's a big site

Precisely. So correlating popularity of Tumblr to gender dysphoria leads one straight to here.

Comment author: Nornagest 20 November 2014 08:20:35PM *  3 points [-]

I'm at work and probably shouldn't click that link, but once again, I'm not saying that MichaelAnissimov's analysis is right; that's a rather complicated question that touches on some deep and AFAIK unresolved issues in identity formation, though priors point to "no". I am saying that Tumblr can accurately be called a major vector for radical identity politics without contradiction with its other use cases. It's both full of straight (and non-straight) erotica and full of LGBT and feminist activists, and the latter are the more relevant when we're discussing its political influence.