You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: Capla 17 November 2014 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 November 2014 03:19:24AM 1 point [-]

Libertarianism leads them to fail to look beyond "safe and not communist"

I am not sure what you are getting at, can you expand..?

both Koreas and Mongolia

Both are states now, but historically their statehood varied.

In any case, I can see the advantages of a single ethnicity, I'm just not sure that they override everything else.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 November 2014 09:20:00PM 4 points [-]

I am not sure what you are getting at, can you expand..?

@sarahdoingthing would be able to explain this better than I can, but Moldbug consistently ignores questions of social life, identity, and the rites.

Safe is preferable to unsafe, and not communist is preferable to communist -- and the possibility of a social life is preferable to atomization, and a stable identity is preferable to anomie and lack of context, and so on.