You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Stuart_Armstrong comments on Population ethics and utility indifference - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 24 November 2014 03:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 24 November 2014 06:01:42PM 2 points [-]

This is the tricky issue of dealing with natural zeros that are below the "zero" of happy/meaningful lives (whatever that is).

As I said, this isn't my favourite setup, but I would advocate requiring the natural zero be positive, and not bringing anyone into existence otherwise. That means that I'd have to reject Case_2 - unless there is anyone who would be sufficiently happy about the existence of B with a hugely positive life, that the tiny effort is less than that happiness.

Total utilitarians, your own happiness can make people come into existence even in these non-total ut situations!